Week 7- Post 3

     Kant went into what he believes freedom really is, and it was interesting to compare what is normally thought of about the meaning of freedom to what Kant defined it as. I agreed with his definition of what makes an action moral though, and I think the given example was a good one to help think about it.

My questions are:

What does Kant consider as natural necessities that humans follow the impulses of other than hunger/appetite?

    -where does he cross the line? because doesnt almost every decision have an impulse behind it, so are all those people just not acting freely